The rebounds from a bad economy were very strong. Now there's something to look forward to for those millions of Americans who can't put bread on the table for their kids. But, why is the stimulus not working all that well. In actuality, the government threw in around $800 billion for President Obama's Recover and Reinvestment Act of 2009. How could it not work? Because it spent money on the wrong things. Remember when we were told all the wonderful new green investments it would allow to create thousands of jobs. And, do you recall how it would bring the U.S. transportation system up-to-date with highway and bridge repairs?

Pork. That's what happened, plus huge support for existing social programs which brought zero new jobs. The Wall Street Journal calls the stimulus "a political wonder that manages to spend money on just about every pent-up Democratic proposal of the last 40 years" (Dwinnell, 2009). Too much spending and not enough tax cuts to get money back into the American public's pockets. That's the complaint.

The Christian Science Monitor makes the point that just $24 billion can be directly apportioned to green investments. That amounts to about $16 billion in tax breaks and $8 billion in loans.

Bottom line without listing the many billions spent that won't create jobs is that about 12% of the stimulus package can be considered a growth stimulus (Dwinnell, 2009).

Hundreds of billions of pork. $260 billion of "discretionary" spending. That's what they call pork these days. Divide the official total stimulus package cost of $787 billion by $260 billion and you come up with 33%. The tax relief in the bill amounts to 34% -- that's the good stuff. So, one-third of the total stimulus package goes for items such as: green (electric) golf carts, $98 million for a U.S. Coast Guard polar icebreaker, $200 million to "design and furnish" the Department of Homeland Security headquarters, $3.4 billion on "clean coal" which won't do anything anytime soon, and, finally, "mystery meat" which consists of $144 billion that flows directly to states and cities for unnamed projects. In Austin, Texas, for example, an $886,000, 36-hole Frisbee golf course was on the list but not allowed due to a technicality (Bandyk, 2009).

However, the $150 million for a parking lot improvement at a Little League ballpark in Cidra, Puerto Rico passes muster, as does $6 million for "snowmaking and maintenance" at a ski area in Minnesota. And that polar icebreaker for the Coast Guard? They...

But their overall goal is to put the spending and the creation (or not) of jobs in light of the American public's interest. The issues are debatable.
Facts are facts, and that is what we have tried to present. The economy and jobs are not being well-served by a, perhaps, well-intentioned but completely political stimulus package.

Bibliography

Associated Press. (2010, January 22). Jobless rates rose in 42 states in November. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from nytimes.com: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/23/business/economy/23jobless.html?fta=y

Bandyk, M. (2009, February 19). Finding the pork in the Obama stimulus bill. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from usnews.com: http://www.usnews.com/money/business-economy/articles/2009/02/19/finding-the-pork-in-the-obama-stimulus-bill.html?PageNr=2

Bloomberg. (2010, January 14). Fed beige book: U.S. economy's on the improve. Retrieved February 3, 2010, from businessday.com: http://www.businessday.com.au/business/markets/fed-beige-book-us-economys-on-the-improve-20100114-m7eu.html

Doughroller. (n.d.). 2009 Economic stimulus package FAQs. Retrieved February 2, 2010, from doughroller.net: http://www.doughroller.net/news-analysis/2009-economic-stimulus-package/

Dwinnell, T. (2009, January 29). Details of economic stimulus package: Too much pork, too little stimulus. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from selfinvestors.com: http://selfinvestors.com/tradingstocks/news/details-of-economic-stimulus-package-too-much-pork-too-little-stimulus/

Editorial. (2010, January 30). No jobs, no recovery. Retrieved February 4, 2010, from nytimes.com: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/opinion/31sun1.html

Isidore, C. (2010, January 29). Best economic growth in six years. Retrieved February 3, 2010, from cnn.com: http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/29/news/economy/gdp/index.htm

Luhby, T. (2010, January 27). Stimulus and jobs: What the fight's all about. Retrieved February 3, 2010, from cnn.com: http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/26/news/economy/stimulus_jobs_questions/index.htm

NYTimes. (2009, December 9). Economic stimulus. Retrieved February 2, 2010, from nytimes.com: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/united_states_economy/economic_stimulus/index.html